2024
Purdue Pharma and the Sackler Family at the Supreme Court
Rothermich E, Gluck A. Purdue Pharma and the Sackler Family at the Supreme Court. JAMA 2024, 332: 1517-1518. PMID: 39320883, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.16176.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchForensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 2: Special Issues and Considerations.
Ely S, Gill J. Forensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 2: Special Issues and Considerations. Academic Forensic Pathology 2024, 19253621241297295. PMID: 39544452, PMCID: PMC11558645, DOI: 10.1177/19253621241297295.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchForensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 1: Common Questions and Considerations
Gill J, Ely S. Forensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 1: Common Questions and Considerations. Academic Forensic Pathology 2024, 15: 28-41. PMID: 39544453, PMCID: PMC11558648, DOI: 10.1177/19253621241297350.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTop Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Caring for Patients Under Guardianships
Bhowmik D, Hurme S, Sandhu J, Jeon J, Mujahid S, Pelissier L, Widera E, Cohen A, Kohn N, Galvez M, Alkire V, Teaster P, Rosa W, Pan C. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Caring for Patients Under Guardianships. Journal Of Palliative Medicine 2024 PMID: 39291357, DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0318.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsPalliative care cliniciansCare cliniciansCoordination of careMedical decision-making processEnd-of-lifeDecision-making processLegal issuesLegal rightsMedical decision-makingPatients' rightsCare deliveryExpertise of physiciansGuardianshipInterprofessional approachProviding careGuardian responsibilitiesCareGuardiansRightsCliniciansAdult patientsDecision-makingCourtLawyersNursesA multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol
Zeoli A, Molocznik A, Paruk J, Omaki E, Frattaroli S, Betz M, Christy A, Kapoor R, Knoepke C, Ma W, Norko M, Pear V, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Schleimer J, Swanson J, Wintemute G. A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol. Injury Epidemiology 2024, 11: 49. PMID: 39252094, PMCID: PMC11382528, DOI: 10.1186/s40621-024-00535-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRisk protection ordersProtection ordersFirearm violenceCivil court ordersPrevent firearm violencePrevent firearm-related injuriesPublic records requestsFirearm-related injuriesDistrict of ColumbiaCourt outcomesCourt orderFirearm purchasesERPOCase filesRecords requestsSecondary traumaViolenceResearch assistantsResearch protocolCourtStateAssistanceFirearmLearning management systemPetitionPatterns of Psychiatric Medication Prescriptions for Veterans in Treatment Courts and Other Specialty Courts
Tsai J, Christian N, Szymkowiak D. Patterns of Psychiatric Medication Prescriptions for Veterans in Treatment Courts and Other Specialty Courts. Journal Of Psychiatric Practice 2024, 30: 119-129. PMID: 38526399, DOI: 10.1097/pra.0000000000000769.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCriminal justice-involvedVeterans Treatment CourtsSubstance use disordersPsychiatric medicationsPrescribed psychiatric medicationsTreatment courtsPsychiatric medication prescriptionSpecialty courtsClasses of psychiatric medicationsService-connected disability ratingVA health care servicesBehavioral health issuesJustice-involvedPsychiatric diagnosisUse disorderCourtPsychiatric prescribingPsychiatric prescriptionsClasses of medicationsVeteransService engagementMedication prescriptionsDisordersMedicationHealth care services
2023
Epilogue: COVID-19 in the Courts
Gluck A, Hutt J. Epilogue: COVID-19 in the Courts. 2023, 391-406. DOI: 10.1017/9781009265690.040.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCombating Scientific Disinformation on Gender-Affirming Care.
McNamara M, Abdul-Latif H, Boulware S, Kamody R, Kuper L, Olezeski C, Szilagyi N, Alstott A. Combating Scientific Disinformation on Gender-Affirming Care. Pediatrics 2023, 152 PMID: 37605864, DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060943.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGender-affirming health careLegal challengesAmicus briefsNational media outletsPolitical actorsPublic statementsPublic opinionLitigatorsPublic commentsPolitical climateBanDisinformationHealth policyPolicy expertsGender-expansive youthMisleading informationPolicyCourtJudgesLawsuitsLawMedia outletsAuthoritiesMedical societiesAdvocatesCost-Free Preventive Care Under the ACA Faces Legal Challenge
Gluck A, Gostin L. Cost-Free Preventive Care Under the ACA Faces Legal Challenge. JAMA 2023, 329: 1733-1734. PMID: 37036869, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.6584.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchThe ALI Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution
McClain L, NeJaime D. The ALI Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution. 2023, 337-364. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197685341.003.0017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchFamily lawFamily dissolutionStatus-based approachCutting-edge issuesDifferent-sex couplesALI PRINCIPLESLegal remediesLegal regulationOngoing debateApplicable principlesU.S. jurisdictionsUnmarried partnersLawProgressive agendaFunctional approachExplicit adoptionSexual orientationCourtJurisdictionsParent-child relationshipLegislaturePrinciplesMinority positionMeaningful interventionsDebate
2022
Investigation of the lawsuits regarding down syndrome
KAYMAKCALAN H. Investigation of the lawsuits regarding down syndrome. Marmara Medical Journal 2022 DOI: 10.5472/marumj.1186743.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInvestigation of the lawsuits regarding Down syndrome
KAYMAKCALAN H. Investigation of the lawsuits regarding Down syndrome. Marmara Medical Journal 2022, 35: 293-296. DOI: 10.5472/marumj.1195921.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
Criminal Protection Orders: Implications of Requested Versus Issued Orders on Domestic Violence Revictimiztion and Mental Health Among Women
Sullivan TP, Weiss NH, Woerner J, Belliveau D. Criminal Protection Orders: Implications of Requested Versus Issued Orders on Domestic Violence Revictimiztion and Mental Health Among Women. Journal Of Interpersonal Violence 2021, 37: np18445-np18464. PMID: 34344213, DOI: 10.1177/08862605211035875.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProtection ordersDomestic violenceCriminal justice systemBeing of victimsMental healthTherapeutic jurisprudenceCourt systemJustice systemVictim inputDV casesOffender behaviorMale intimate partnersVictimsMental health outcomesGreater restrictionsDegree of restrictionHealth outcomesIntimate partnersSignificant decreaseOutcomesCourtJurisprudenceDegree of changeVictimizationProceedingsCriminal Protection Orders Among Women Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: Women’s Experiences of Court Decisions, Processes, and Their Willingness to Engage With the System in the Future
Holmes SC, Maxwell CD, Cattaneo LB, Bellucci BA, Sullivan TP. Criminal Protection Orders Among Women Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: Women’s Experiences of Court Decisions, Processes, and Their Willingness to Engage With the System in the Future. Journal Of Interpersonal Violence 2021, 37: np16253-np16276. PMID: 34130534, PMCID: PMC10968615, DOI: 10.1177/08862605211021965.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCourt processProtection ordersCourt decisionsTherapeutic jurisprudence frameworkIntimate Partner Violence VictimsVictims' subjective experiencesPartner violence victimsCourt experienceVictims' requestsAntitherapeutic effectsWomen victimsVictim experienceViolence victimsPO levelsCourtVictimsIntimate partner violenceFuture engagementDecisionsPartner violenceWomen's experiencesRequestsAutonomyViolenceWillingnessUnorthodox Lawmaking and Legislative Complexity in American Statutory Interpretation
Gluck A. Unorthodox Lawmaking and Legislative Complexity in American Statutory Interpretation. Legisprudence Library 2021, 8: 195-225. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72748-2_9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLegislative processStatutory interpretationAmerican judgesSupreme Court justicesTraditional legislative processLack of deliberationAmerican political systemModern lawmakingAmerican juristsDoctrinal approachesCourt justicesDue processFederal statutesU.S. statutesLegal movementLegislative complexityLawmakingCongressional sessionsStatutesJudgesPolitical systemInterpretive approachInterpretationCourtJuristsAttachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues
Forslund T, Granqvist P, van IJzendoorn M, Sagi-Schwartz A, Glaser D, Steele M, Hammarlund M, Schuengel C, Bakermans-Kranenburg M, Steele H, Shaver P, Lux U, Simmonds J, Jacobvitz D, Groh A, Bernard K, Cyr C, Hazen N, Foster S, Psouni E, Cowan P, Cowan C, Rifkin-Graboi A, Wilkins D, Pierrehumbert B, Tarabulsy G, Carcamo R, Wang Z, Liang X, Kazmierczak M, Pawlicka P, Ayiro L, Chansa T, Sichimba F, Mooya H, McLean L, Verissimo M, Gojman-de-Millán S, Moretti M, Bacro F, Peltola M, Galbally M, Kondo-Ikemura K, Behrens K, Scott S, Rodriguez A, Spencer R, Posada G, Cassibba R, Barrantes-Vidal N, Palacios J, Barone L, Madigan S, Jones-Mason K, Reijman S, Juffer F, Fearon R, Bernier A, Cicchetti D, Roisman G, Cassidy J, Kindler H, Zimmermann P, Feldman R, Spangler G, Zeanah C, Dozier M, Belsky J, Lamb M, Duschinsky R. Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues. Attachment & Human Development 2021, 24: 1-52. PMID: 33427578, DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1840762.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFamily courtsApplication of attachment theoryChild protectionBest-interest-of-the-child standardChild custody decision-makingCourt decision-makingCustody decision-makingNon-abusive caregiversAttachment theoryChild protection decisionsChild custodyCustody issuesAttachment qualityCourtDecision-makingCustodyChildren's needsAttachment relationshipsCaregiving behaviorProtectionCenter stageEvidence-based directionAttachment principleMisunderstandingsSupport interventions
2020
Dignity and Transcultural Forensic Consultation.
Griffith EEH, Greenidge NE. Dignity and Transcultural Forensic Consultation. The Journal Of The American Academy Of Psychiatry And The Law 2020 PMID: 32675331, DOI: 10.29158/jaapl.200021-20.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConfidentiality Orders and Public Interest in Drug and Medical Device Litigation
Egilman AC, Kesselheim AS, Krumholz HM, Ross JS, Kim J, Kapczynski A. Confidentiality Orders and Public Interest in Drug and Medical Device Litigation. JAMA Internal Medicine 2020, 180: 292-299. PMID: 31657836, DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5161.Commentaries, Editorials and LettersConceptsLegal practicePublic interestMedical device litigationImportant public health informationLegal standardsMedical device manufacturersLitigationSpecial communicationCourtObscure patternsCompany marketingMedical expertsRulesPublic health informationDevice manufacturersPublic healthSuccessful effortsLitigantsPracticePlaintiffsLawsuitsCertain typesInterestAccessDrug Administration
2019
Introduction
Tsai J. Introduction. 2019, 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31664-8_1.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
Forensic Psychiatry
Appel J, Garakani A, Kunz M. Forensic Psychiatry. 2016, 368-372. DOI: 10.1002/9781118654231.ch43.ChaptersForensic psychiatryForensic psychiatristsDistinct dutiesLegal professionInsanity defenseSexual offendersCorrectional institutionsCivil commitmentPsychiatryCorrectional settingsTherapeutic workPsychiatristsThird partyMalpractice claimsOffendersClaimsDutyPartiesResponsibilityCommitmentInstitutionsProfessionCourtFellowshipDefense
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply